Review of low-income housing incentives underway

Kitchener councillors voted unanimously this week to review a series of incentives that will help increase the city’s supply of low-income housing.

The approval to hire a planning student who will assemble information about incentive-bonus housing programs used by municipalities came during a 13-hour budget meeting.

And, although I’m convinced the review will repeat work already done by Waterloo Region housing officials and other Ontario municipalities, the council decision at least represents a slow start toward recognition of the increasing affordable-housing problem.

The program provides developers with a smorgasboard of incentives and bonuses that will increase construction of low-income homes, particularly in and around Light Rail Transit station areas spread throughout downtown wards.

Earlier this year, affordable housing was identified by most Kitchener councillors as one of their top 12 priority work items.

Lower-tier municipalities like Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the townships or single-tier cities like Toronto, Ottawa and Hamilton are the only bodies allowed to sponsor incentive programs because density bonusing comes under their control.

This week, I joined Mayor Berry Vrbanovic and Couns. Dave Schnider and Sarah Marsh at a seminar about low-income housing held in Cambridge where regional and municipal officials joined homelessness and social activists to discuss the subject.

We plan to join forces with Waterloo and Cambridge in order to continue efforts to have subsidized housing treated as a high-priority subject because we all share the responsibility for easing a situation where the region has 3,000 names on a waiting list for affordable shelter. Those names represent at least 8,000 children, seniors and adults who, for decades, have made do with inadequate housing.

This entry was posted in Budget, Homelessness, Light Rail Transit, Low-Cost Housing, Neighbourhoods. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Review of low-income housing incentives underway

  1. Karen says:

    Frank as much as we need affordable housing I think council should also be focusing on job creation for people so as to decrease the demand for affordable . Has council looked into existing affordable housing are the people now living there still in need?

  2. mdryber says:

    ^^ That is an important question. I’d like to know if affordable housing is a “permanent” solution to low-income, or if the people given the assistance are then going and using the supports in the community to eventually leave the affordable housing. It shouldn’t be a permanent home. It should be a place where they can get themselves into a way better situation by not having to worry about high rents. My other question, as a resident of Ward 9, are there other locations as prominent for affordable housing as Ward 9? Seems to me a lot of the proposals for affordable housing are in Ward 9. Why aren’t other wards as accepting or initiating proposals for development in their neighbourhood? Sometimes, I feel Cedar Hill is the “go-to” location for everything NIMBY. “Not in My Backyard”. Counsellors wanting affordable housing, community supports and services, assisted living communities…just so long as it doesn’t “spew” into their sculpted gardens and double-wide driveways. I appreciate everything you do, Frank, to make Ward 9 as “nice” as the rest of this great city. I wish others would step up the same way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s